The deceptions of María Corina Machado (2)
Published at: 31/01/2025 06:00 PM
María Corina Machado's file is
riddled with failures that show her fascist and destabilizing behavior.
From the 2002 coup d'etat to his calls to the
streets in recent days, he has demonstrated that his only answer to democracy
is violence. For more than two decades, he has deceived his followers
with promises of change that never came true, while his actions have
brought only death, destruction and disappointment. Machado's trajectory is not that of a leader, but that of an agitator unable to
accept the popular will and obsessed with power at any cost. In the previous
article we described their actions from 2002 to 2017,
this time we presented their actions between 2019 and 2020.
In 2019 , it accompanied the most illegal event attempted by the
Venezuelan opposition, because that figure does not appear in the Constitution of the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela ( CRBV), of the
so-called interim government of the deputy Juan
Guaidó, with the slogan “
cessation of usurpation, transitional government and free elections”, in which once again, Machado requested foreign intervention in our
country, when he declared “what remains is nothing other
than the application of all
forces inside and outside the country, in the same direction, to cause the breakdown of
the dictatorship.” Once again, Machado
showed his support for destabilizing actions, this time supporting
the coup d'etat in Bolivia that
overthrew President Evo Morales. This position reaffirmed its
alignment with movements that seek foreign intervention and the
destabilization of legitimate governments in Latin America.
Then, in 2020, he maintained his bellicose stance, with speeches like this: “We are fighting to bring together all internal and
external forces and remove Maduro now. The
situation in the country is unsustainable, it is today that we need and have the
support of Western democracies, we can no longer look the other way.
We are at the moment when it is defined in what way and when the exit is, today
the exit is inevitable”. From the fictitious interim period of Guaidó, he promoted actions such as the formation of an
international coalition to deploy a Peace and Stabilization Operation in Venezuela (
OPE).
According to the
opposition representative, to oppose the presence of this international force is to condemn the
nation to coexistence with Chavism, and she explained that “although there is no right
of intervention, the obligation to intervene and the right to protect
(R2P) are legitimate”, she said in a document endorsed by the acting guy, in which he enumerated the
objectives of this “multifaceted peace operation: a) land control, security and disarmament; b) primary humanitarian assistance; c) reconstruction
emergency infrastructure and public services; d) restoration
of law and order; e) promotion of the rule of law and f) democratic
reinstitutionalization of the country”.
In addition, he reiterated his interest in creating an international
coalition, that “from a causal point of view, the success of
each of these objectives is a prerequisite for the success of the others. For this reason,
I believe that this operation should not depend on a single organization, but
should be made up of different allies (institutions and countries) with regional
disposition and legitimacy within the framework of the Inter-American Treaty of
Reciprocal Assistance (TIAR) and different inter-American mechanisms.”
Also in that year, since the TIAR application document was not
taken into account , in September and as a measure of pressure, he sent a
public letter addressed to Juan Guaidó, in which he explained his annoyance at not having activated actions to
invade Venezuela and that this caused
a delay in the departure of Nicolás Maduro . Below is an
excerpt from the public letter:
“I always told you that leaving
the Maduro regime required
building an option of force, and that for this purpose the activation of the TIAR was important. I have personally contributed to this
task, just as the Ambassador to the OAS must have informed
you in detail. This work was lengthy and did not receive the
commitment of the interim after the first achievement. You have
consistently refused to approve Article 187.11, which would be part of the
legal framework for international support and an unequivocal message, both to our
international allies and to the regime itself. Nobody believes that approving an
article solves the problem; this statement is disrespectful. The question has been to create a device in which
the international coalition can develop based on the
same Constitution that made you interim President. Even so, despite the fact
that you rejected the proposals we have formulated, we have supported the interim
in those decisions that we believed helped to remove the regime from power. Juan,
there are opportunities that have been missed. The country gave you a task that you
could not or did not want to fulfill. That task was limited to leaving the regime. The
wasted time has caused setbacks: just as several countries that voted to
activate the TIAR today are reviewing
their decision, there are some of the 60 countries that recognized you as
interim President, that are proposing false solutions with impossible dialogues or elections with the mafias in power.
Yes, there is an alternative proposal to
achieve the liberation of Venezuela.
This route requires scaling up and coordinating internal and external forces in a solid
strategy, with reliable leadership underpinned by the
libertarian and unyielding spirit of Venezuelans. Let's make it happen once and for all.”
Then, that same year, he signed an
agreement with the Israeli LIKUD party ,
which today is leading the massacre in Gaza,
for the formation of his organization Vente
Venezuela, he posted the following on his
Instagram account: “We are proud to announce that we signed a cooperation agreement with @_Likud_Party in Israel
to advance issues of strategy, geopolitics and security. It is a
historic step that we are taking as a party and in defense of Western values:
freedom, the rule of law and the free market. This alliance sends a
clear message to the regime of Nicolás Maduro, to Venezuelans and to the world
about consolidating relations with strategic allies for the Venezuelan
struggle, in the face of threats such as that of Iran.”
The political organizations LIKUD and Vente Venezuela
also announced that cooperation includes “political, ideological and social issues, as
well as progress on issues related to strategy, geopolitics and
security”, so that this closeness becomes an operational partnership; that
is, as we have seen the actions of that party on
Palestinian soil; they share physical elimination by way of the genocide against their political
opponents.
According to the narrative of
these events, it is evident, public and notorious that the actions led by María Corina Machado do not
pose any democratic struggle; on the contrary, it reflects their
violent nature and their intentions to promote a war between Venezuelans.
AMELYREN BASABE/Mazo News Team