Straw tail: Pedophilia in elite morality

Published at: 12/01/2024 05:50 PM

At least 180 people belonging to the global elite were regular customers of a pedophilia business and for years they visited an island to participate in this crime. Strangely enough, in the face of this, the world is not shocked or condemned these events.

In order to understand this type of behavior, we reviewed an article by the philosopher and psychologist Lucas Manuel Bietti published in 2009 called “Cognitive Processes to Justify Immoral Actions ” in the Journal of Cognitive Science, in which he asks: “How is it possible that there are people who, because they have money and power, do immoral acts and continue to go about your life unaffected? Why doesn't the world condemn these aberrant acts out loud?” ; the philosopher explained that “these types of scandals are undermined by the amount of power, money and influence that these people have, since they are convinced that there are no laws or social structure that prevents them from satisfying their darkest desires”.

In addition, we see with concern the detriment of citizen values within the construction of society and, as defined by the doctor of psychology Jordi Quiodbach, moral values “are criteria for social life that regulate our behavior and are used to guide our actions and reactions”.

A few days ago, a second list of clients of a child trafficking network was released in which a large part of the American elite appear, such as bankers, politicians, scientists, billionaires and European monarchs, led by the American Jeffrey Epstein.

Bolivarian Revolution, associated with a matrix of opinion aimed at disrespect for human rights and alleged crimes against humanity in our country. As it turns out, they are identified as clients of this child trafficking network Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald Trump; the President of the United States Joe Biden, politicians Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, former Colombian President Andrés Pastrana, billionaire Richard Branson and actress Angelina Jolie .

Here are some of the statements they have made in order to attack Venezuela:

BILL CLINTON. The former president known for not controlling his sexual desires. In 2015, during the 7th Summit of the Americas , the citizen who opposed the political party Voluntad Popular, Carlos Vecchio , met with Clinton, who on that occasion declared that “the fight for democracy and human rights has no nationality, no ideologies, no borders”, associated with Leopoldo López's sentence for leading terrorist actions in 2017.

BARACK OBAMA. The former US president, who holds the record of having imprisoned and murdered the largest number of African-Americans by the police during his term of office, before completing it, issued a decree that described Venezuela as an “ unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States of America.”

DONALD TRUMP. Of the 960 sanctions that the United States maintains against Venezuela, 765 signed during its administration, thus giving force to the decree signed by Obama, starting the economic terrorism that we have experienced until now.

In this way, Trump, using the excuse of the sanctions applied unilaterally by his country, declared that “all assets and interests owned by the Venezuelan government that are in the United States, or that are under the power or control of any person in the United States, are blocked and cannot be transferred, paid for, exported, withdrawn from or otherwise treated”. We are currently in a legal battle to recover CITGO.

In a letter to the U.S. Congress, Trump justified the seizure of Venezuelan State property and explained that “in light of the continued usurpation of power by the illegitimate regime of Nicolás Maduro.” In that letter, he also referred to “human rights abuses, arbitrary arrests and detention of Venezuelan citizens, the reduction of press freedom and attempts to undermine interim president Juan Guaidó”; this in order to justify his decision.

JOE BIDEN. The incumbent American president maintains a policy of blackmail against our country, declaring on several occasions that “if the government of Nicolás Maduro takes action to restore democracy and respect for human rights, the United States could allow the exports of the last U.S. company that produces oil in the South American country to reactivate,” he said in a press conference in October 2022.

However, despite having announced the lifting of some sanctions in 2023, these have not been effective, so they have not yet been reflected in the increase in domestic production and, therefore, in national revenues.

BERNIE SANDERS . When he participated in 2019 as a candidate for the presidency of the United States, his answers to questions about the management of relations with our country, he repeatedly stated that “the United States must support the rule of law, fair elections and the self-determination of the Venezuelan people. We must condemn the use of violence against unarmed demonstrators and the suppression of dissent,” he said.

In addition, referring to the Venezuelan President, in an interview he gave to the CNN news channel, he said, “Let me be clear. Anyone who does what Maduro does is a perverse tyrant,” and he reiterated that “what we need now is international and regional cooperation to have free elections in Venezuela so that the people of that country can create their own future.”

HILLARY CLINTON. At a press conference during her candidacy for president in 2016, the former Secretary of State lamented the situation in Venezuela, where, in her opinion, “democracy is being undermined, a step backwards has been taken since the arrival of Hugo Chávez (1999/2013) to power”.

Later, in 2019, he declared that “Nicolás Maduro must allow humanitarian aid to enter the borders of Venezuela in a peaceful manner. People need lifesaving medicines , children live on one meal a day, and the peaceful delivery of food and supplies benefits everyone,” Clinton said.

ANDRES PASTRANA . Despite the fact that during his term of office, the average homicide rate at the beginning of his administration was 61.2 per 100,000 inhabitants and he closed it in 2002 with 64.6%, he maintains a permanent question regarding insecurity in Venezuela, calling it a “dictatorship”. He also stated in a dialogue with the television channel Noticias Caracol, that “the Venezuelan regime has financed vandalism in Colombia.”

He even dared to declare that “the enemy of Colombia is not trade unionists or students, the enemy of Colombia is called Venezuela and directly Nicolás Maduro, Diosdado Cabello, all that narco-dictatorship that is in Venezuela.” He said that “They have said it themselves and Diosdado directly: “We are going to wage war in Colombia” and they are waging war on us. What are they looking for? Deinstitutionalize the country and they are succeeding. And they are funding it. If you go to Bucaramanga, to Cucuta, in the squares they are paying young people 50,000 and 100,000 pesos,” said the former president in an interview with the news portal Infobae in June 2022.

RICHARD BRANSON. The eccentric American billionaire, known for financing the Aid Live Venezuela concert in 2019 and who, despite never having been to our country, declared before the start of the event in Cúcuta that “the regime of Nicolás Maduro, responsible for this crisis, is currently refusing to allow humanitarian aid to enter the country”. He also stated that “the United States and several countries in Latin America and Europe have recognized Guaidó as president in charge of Venezuela.”

He also added that “in January of that year, the US government imposed severe sanctions on the oil industry of the member country of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which are intended to deprive the Maduro government of income to force its exit and we must break this deadlock or soon many Venezuelans will be on the verge of starvation or death,” said the businessman during the development of his concert.

ANGELINA JOLIE. In his role as representative of the United Nations for Refugees (UNHCR), he stated that “this is a life-or-death situation for millions of Venezuelans.” “It's not possible to put a price on the support that Colombia, Peru and Ecuador are giving to the people of Venezuela, because that's what being human is all about,” he added.

Paradoxically, these characters who are carrying out a campaign to discredit Venezuela and its leaders, denounce that human rights are not respected in our country and crimes against humanity are committed, are identified as clients of a structure dedicated to the trafficking of children for sexual use. None of the Venezuelans whom they denounce are associated with this type of pedophile practices.

Faced with this scandal, we see that once again the need for citizen training to maintain a healthy society is evident. As Commander Hugo Chávez said in May 2010 during a conversation about building a new society: “The moral aspect is one of the most important for deepening the Bolivarian process in the transition to socialism, since this is one of the fundamental factors of any revolution.”

So, it is worth asking: On what moral grounds can a person identified as a sexual perpetrator of children accuse another without evidence of committing crimes against humanity? How is it that the world does not condemn such acts with the firmness it deserves?

AMELYREN BASABE/ DECK WRITING